The life of the dead is placed
in the memory of the living.
Marcus Tullius Cicero
Kids, they are so expressive…
|
Writing about Africa some four months after the fact, due to
lack of internet during the trip, is tougher, memories no longer fresh in
mind. I need to immerse back in ‘that’ moment to effectively write about
it, something made harder when surrounded by routine and the many familiar comforts
of home.
On one hand it is great because I get to relive incredible events, on the other I know the writing is missing the true essence of these past experiences, much having occurred since. Pictures and notes help jog the mind, but it is not the same as smelling the place, hearing the people, seeing the animals and landscape as you are writing about them.
One thing that remained crystal clear despite the passage of
time was our visit to the Kigali’s
Genocide Memorial Center. I
hesitated to approach this difficult and painful subject. I have, frankly, been procrastinating.
First, let’s get back on the road to that destination,
moving from Uganda to Rwanda.
Much of what I write has to do with what I saw from Pluto,
our transportation, the reality being that we covered nearly 8,700 miles (14,000
km) in 73 days. About 40% of our time was
on the road with little interaction, merely passive viewing of the outside world
from our vehicular cocoon.
Church and Muhabura volcano
|
Refugee camp – quiet time |
We retrace our incoming route for a short while, seeing a
refugee camp (one of 12 in Uganda) which still accepts people at a rate of
about 300/day. Since its inception, this
camp has seen over one million refugees.
From Rwanda then, to South Sudan and Congo today. Uganda is the largest refugee-hosting nation
in Africa. I didn’t realize at the time that
this refugee camp was a prelude to what I would see in the Kigali Genocide
Memorial Center.
Many of the kids walking around are wearing mismatched
sandals or shoes, if any. At the hotel
we just left, we were offered pairs of shower sandals, also mismatched, one
blue, the other red… at least of the same size.
Coal, coal, coal – so destructive but necessary
|
Getting a ride up the hill
|
Cow dung is drying on the ground in neat rows – for
cooking? I do not know but it is very
likely. Cassava also drying but away from critters, way up on the roof. In tall trees log beehives are nested in the
branches or hung from them. They blend
in quite well and are difficult to spot.
Log hive hung from branches or laid in branch ‘V’
|
Small bundles of firewood are neatly piled at the roadside,
another way to make a little money but as in the production of charcoal or
bricks, quickly denuding the forests around.
Propane being suggested as a ‘better/healthier’ option but who can
afford it?
So lush and inviting
|
We begin to see tobacco farms. Brown leaves drying under eaves or in special
sheds.
Reddish termite mounds are emerging in open fields, some
nearly eight feet tall. Goats like to
climb on them. One guide tells us
animals will make den in them once the termites move on. We have only seen mongoose running in and out
of older inactive mounds.
What looks like a domesticated duck is walking around with a
long piece of black plastic attached to one of its legs. A way to slow it down or make it easier to
catch? Pigs have free reign in many
villages.
Happy pig in the shade
|
Coffee grows here too.
We are told the coffee from Uganda is not appreciated, so it is
rebranded as coming from a different country, to sell better. The coffee you think is from Kenya may be
from here…
Sunday’s best – walking, always walking
|
It is Sunday, and many are brightly and fancily dressed yet
still attending to their herd, re-staking some of the animals on their way to
church. Women carrying treats on their
head to eat after the service.
Women of Africa have been known to carry up to 70% of their
body weight on their head! Based on some
studies of women of the Luo and Kikuyu tribes of East Africa, researchers
have found that they can carry loads of up
to 20 percent of their own body weight without
expending extra energy beyond what they would use by walking around
unencumbered (a few studies do not agree with this).
Brick ovens
|
A novel smell fills the air from the brewing of banana
beer. Supposedly of a lower alcohol
content but still needing to ferment, hence the sweet smell in the air.
This Land Is Not
For Sale
Cadasta Foundation photo
|
Over time I notice more and more signs in fields, signs on
homes, signs on fences, signs on gates and on trees that say: This
Land Is Not For Sale in one way or another and I am puzzled. Why would so many people spend time and
energy to say their land was not for sale?
Land remains the most valuable and least secure asset across most of
Africa. The World Bank estimates that 90 percent of the land in
Africa is undocumented. Most Africa's women and men rely on
this land, to which they have insecure rights, for their housing and their
livelihoods.
From quiet fields to cities, these signs are warnings. Who are these words targeting? They are there to deter the conmen from
trying to sell land that is not theirs and to inform the possible buyer to be
wary of quack brokers and fake titles.
Happening mostly when owners are away, it is so common that ‘buying air’ has become part of the
vernacular. Nearly 75% of real estate transactions
are fraud related.
Signs are not always sufficient, at times, people hire
guards to sleep on their property for extra safety, especially in heavily
populated and rapidly growing areas.
Computerized land registry has reduced fraud but there is
more to do. The government plans to start
registering brokers. In 2017, a judicial
committee found there were over 22,400 pending land cases, of which over 6,600
had been in the court system for at least two years.
Studies highlight the negative impact insecure land rights have on
conservation, security, poverty alleviation, and economic empowerment in Africa
and beyond. A big push is made to
address this issue.
Want to sell your property in a
developed economy?
Put up a for sale sign.
Put up a for sale sign.
Want to keep your property in
an emerging economy?
Put up a NOT for sale sign.
Put up a NOT for sale sign.
These signs are written in fear.
Source: Liam Taylor and Frank Pichel
As we enter Rwanda, many things change. The roads are wide, well built, and
clean. There is even landscaping to
beautify the roadways. Rwanda has
invested heavily in infrastructure and rebuilding of urban areas. It is the cleanest country we encounter in
Africa.
Low lands in the valley are very wet, and we see houses
sitting on stilts surrounded by mound farming.
People are knee deep in the mud working the fields. Babies sleeping or playing under umbrellas on
the side of the fields away from water, mud and sun.
Large poinsettia bushes are brightening the landscape. The area is lush and colorful, but hardly making
up for its very dark recent past.
Kigali Genocide Memorial
Center
Entrance
sign without the word ‘Genocide’…
|
The official name for what happened in Rwanda is the ‘Genocide against the Tutsi’, (United
Nations in 2014). The machete became a
symbol synonymous to the genocide for its widespread use by untrained civilians
to attack or kill their neighbors. Hutu
extremists embarked on large-scale imports of machetes the year prior to the
attacks. They also imported arms and grenades, but the use of machetes resonates
more with the public as illustrative of the genocide. In 2005, information surfaced showing China
provided these machetes to Rwanda. Large
arms deal (guns and grenades) of $12M was conducted with France.
Machetes accounted for over 53% of the killings
|
Faces of the victims, more than names or statistics
help personalize and humanize the impact of the killing spree
|
In their language, they
spell it Jenocide.
One hundred days, 800,000 dead.
8,000/day, more than 330/hour!
70-90% of Tutsi population wiped out.
Only 300,000 survivors.
The high rate of killings between April and July of 1994 is
considered
three to five times greater than
the Holocaust of Nazi Germany.
(estimate by the United Nations)
More than two million fled to neighboring countries, some from fear
of retribution (Hutu), some from fear of being killed (Tutsi). Many dying in disease-ridden overcrowded
refugee camps in Burundi, Tanzania, Uganda (the one we passed by was one of
them), and former Zaire. Data shows that 5% of the people were good, 5% were
neutral, and the remaining 90% were involved.
How can you convince so many people to turn against their own family,
neighbors, friends, or co-workers overnight?
It is baffling to see what fear and manipulation can do.
The story is not
unique.
European colonizers heavily favored the Tutsi (14% of population),
who had lighter skin and finer features than their Hutu (85%) and Twa (1%)
counterpart. European anthropologists constructed elaborate explanations and
racial theories to explain the differences between the groups and to defend
Tutsi superiority. The only real
difference was an ethnic identity that was a product of colonial rule; socio
economic classifications becoming racial under colonization. Belgium put the minority Tutsi in charge of
Rwanda but at the end of colonial rule, began giving more power to the
Hutu. As the Hutu gained more leverage,
they began to drive the Tutsi out of Rwanda and significantly lowered the
population of Tutsi in the country.
The genocide against the
Tutsi is a heavy moment in history. An airplane crash in 1994 carrying the
presidents of Rwanda and Burundi provided a stimulus for an organized campaign
of violence against the Tutsi and moderate Hutu civilians across the country.
Many Hutu resented the
Tutsi, as they were typically considered the elite and had ruled the country
for decades. As a result, they also feared the Tutsi and were determined to
hold on to their own power. The Hutu created Ten Commandments (see here).
When President Habyarimana’s
(a Hutu) plane crashed, Hutu extremists assumed it was the Tutsi who shot it
down. Immediately, Hutu set out to destroy the entire Tutsi population and seek
revenge on the power that had always been deemed the elite.
The political vacuum created
by the death of the president enabled Hutu extremists to take control of the
country. Detailed lists of Tutsi targets were prepared in advance and
government radio stations called upon Rwandans to murder their neighbors. Specific lists included names,
addresses and sometimes license plates. Through radio hate speech, people were
encouraged to take the streets and exterminate those who matched the list. Everyone becoming complicit and paranoid.
The genocidal violence began with extreme swiftness after President
Habyarimana's death. His plane was shot down at 8:30 pm; by 9:15 pm, Hutu
police had already set up roadblocks and begun searching Tutsi homes. This is
seen as evidence of a common origin for the assassination plot and the
perpetration of the genocide.
When the killing began, everyone who was able to flee did
so. As unparalleled violence erupted in Rwanda, westerners boarded planes
that whisked them back to safety.
The radio was also utilized to justify the genocide. Radio hosts
discussed discrimination the Hutu suffered under the power of the Tutsi. Strong
connotations describing Hutu as slaves during colonization painted the Rwandan
genocide as a type of slave rebellion. Radio stories were used to anger the
Hutu and channel that anger into action. Radio was also used to dehumanize
Tutsi by calling them ‘cockroaches’,
making acts of violence against them seem less inhumane.
One radio broadcaster even shouted:
‘The graves are not yet quite full. Who
is going to do the good work and help us fill them completely?’
Shamefully, the UN at best did too little too late, but in
reality, did almost nothing, putting into question the resolve of an
organization, which only seems empowered to act when the interests of the major
world powers are involved.
In that period from April to July 1994 reports of systematic
mass murder within Rwanda began to circulate around the world. Little, though,
was done to halt the killing. To outsiders the genocide was represented as
tribal-based ethnic violence, with the Tutsi the victims.
As former U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali told the PBS
news program Frontline: ‘The
failure of Rwanda is 10 times greater than the failure of Yugoslavia. Because
in Yugoslavia the international community was interested, was involved. In
Rwanda nobody was interested.’
An
issue that needs continued and critical reflection is how the Genocide was reported and covered by the international media. As Bartholomäus Grill, one of
the few journalists who covered the Genocide notes,
‘It
wasn’t just the UN, the West and other African nations that failed; it was also
journalists, like me. We ran after the big story in South Africa, paying little
attention to Rwanda or merely spreading clichés about the country.’
Most notably, news agencies sent top journalists to
cover the election of Nelson Mandela and his ‘long walk to freedom’ instead.
Some journalists
who were in Rwanda still feel guilt for their faulty coverage. Lindsey Hilsum,
who reported from Kigali in the first days of the Genocide, recalled how difficult it was to
cover events in 1994:
‘We
simply didn’t think about the idea of war crimes or genocide. That was
something that happened to Jews, and perhaps to a degree in the Balkans or with
Pol Pot…I didn’t use the word ‘genocide’ until the end of the month, for other
journalists it took longer.
Today we know that the genocide was not the work of
archaic, chaotic powers, but of an educated, modern elite that availed itself
of all the tools of a highly organized state: the military and the police, the
intelligence services and militias, the government bureaucracy and the mass
media.
The report is emblematic of others from the time. Each saw events
in Rwanda through the prism of the all too irresistible heart of darkness
narrative wherein violence is something quintessentially African, utterly
senseless, undoubtedly backward and, above all, apolitical.’
Sad highlights:
- Tutsi pretending to be Hutu to survive
- People killing next of kin, being placed in positions of social and moral complexity especially in cases of Hutu-Tutsi intermarriage. Tutsi side of the family would be killed while the Hutu side would be spared. Women forced to kill their Tutsi children
- Severing of Achilles tendons so they could not run away and many more atrocities
- 250,000 women raped by HIV positive men, gang-raped, raped with weapons or sharpened sticks, or subject to genital mutilation
- 100,000-300,000 orphaned, abducted or abandoned
- 85,000 kids became head of household, many handicapped
- 70% of kids saw someone killed or injured
- 80% of kids experienced death in their family
- 90% of kids thought they would die
- 26% of the Rwandan population still suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder today
- Killing of journalists
- Hutu also died if they were neutral or moderate or tried to help Tutsi or looked Tutsi
- Priests and nuns killed simply because they tried to stop the killers
- Leaders of Christian churches supporting the genocide to secure their own power
- Killed for speaking good French or owning nice things – signs of social distinction marking them possible liberals
- Water wells poisoned
- Scale of tragedy rarely witnessed by Red Cross
The center deals with the subject matter sensitively and
puts the Rwandan genocide into the context of other genocides of the twentieth
century. Hitler, Milosevic, Karadzic,
Pol Pot in Cambodia and the genocide of the Armenians.
There were videos, with Rwandans telling their story. More than
anything, it was their calm voice while recounting horrible events that made a
strong impact.
Stainglass centerpiece |
In the aftermath of the killings, there was a need for
justice, and although there was an International Criminal Tribunal established
in Tanzania, it seems that the village Gacaca
Courts provided the most successful route to reconciliation. A community justice system which basically
means ‘justice amongst the grass’,
was adjudicated by amateur, specially trained judges and village elders. This system enabled the quick trial and
judgement of alleged perpetrators, and over the following decade 12,000
community courts tried between 1.2 and 1.9 million cases. Any normal judiciary system would have
collapsed under the strain. In the same
period the International Criminal Tribunal indicted just 93 cases, sentencing only
61.
Let that sink in, a quarter of a million! |
In a primary school classroom in 1997, Tutsi and Hutu were
asked to split up on each side of the room.
The kids refused to do so – staying united, showing more soundness than
the adults. The separation almost came
back…
In 2003 the country adopted a new constitution which
eliminated any reference to ethnicity.
Today many of the perpetrators have been released and walk the streets
and live in houses in the same villages as their victims. Some witnessed those convicted of crimes
involved with the genocide working alongside villagers in the fields growing
and harvesting crops. I am not sure how
they do it, could I?
Leaving Genocide Center – extremely tight exit
Wheel against wall
|
Timothy Longman acknowledges
that the current government is very efficient, is successfully managing
development, and has been relatively effective in its fight against corruption.
But, he says, Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) leaders are working hard to keep
tight reins on power. Ideas and initiatives are dictated from the top. And
while the RPF government has done a great job of attracting international
investment, economic inequality is widespread, and freedom of speech is treated
as a luxury the country cannot afford.
‘I don’t think any kind of positive development in Rwanda is possible
for the long term unless the government begins to allow its population to speak
and to organize and to think for itself.’
Rwanda was dead but is now a rising nation recognized as the
most stable and safest in Africa. Will
it last?
The strategy of the perpetrators was that Tutsi should be robbed of
their future altogether by taking away their youth, tomorrow lost.
The story is not over, in December 2017, French officials were accused
of complicity in Rwanda genocide (see here).
Rwanda is the
only country in the ten we visited in Africa where it was difficult to connect
with the people, the only time in my seven years of traveling full-time. After finding out that the French helped the
Hutu side get arms, it is understandable that the locals wouldn’t want to speak
with me once they found out I spoke French even though they would address me in
that language first. I truly feel for
these people, I am not sure I would be able to work with a person I know raped
my sister or maimed my uncle. The weight
of the genocide is a hard one to bear, I am in awe of people who can get
through this, but it is haunting and difficult to comprehend.
The few words
and pictures describing what I learned of this gruesome event do little to show
the real magnitude of the destruction and pain caused to people like you and me. I only wish I could express it better.
As some
people say, Democracy dies in darkness - - - we must remember this!
Be well and know
how lucky you are to have a tomorrow.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We are always happy to hear from you but at times it may take a while to get a reply - all depends if we have access to the internet.